Skip to content
Latchkey

GitHub Actions reusable workflow "with:" input type mismatch

A reusable workflow declares each input with a type (string, boolean, number). Passing a value of the wrong type via with - most often a quoted string where a boolean is expected - fails validation.

What this error means

The caller fails to start the reusable workflow, reporting that a with input does not match the declared type.

github-actions
##[error]Invalid value. Input 'deploy' expects type 'boolean' but was provided 'true' as a string.

Diagnose it: print the context before you change anything

Most workflow-expression bugs are not syntax errors, they are an expression reading something that is empty. GitHub resolves a missing property to an empty string instead of failing the run, so a wrong reference looks like a logic bug rather than a mistake. Dump the contexts first and you will usually see the answer immediately.

.github/workflows/ci.yml
- name: Dump contexts
  run: |
    echo '--- github ---'   ; echo '${{ toJSON(github) }}'
    echo '--- needs ---'    ; echo '${{ toJSON(needs) }}'
    echo '--- steps ---'    ; echo '${{ toJSON(steps) }}'
    echo '--- matrix ---'   ; echo '${{ toJSON(matrix) }}'
    echo '--- inputs ---'   ; echo '${{ toJSON(inputs) }}'

Check the context is allowed where you used it

Contexts are not available everywhere. The same expression can be valid in a step if and invalid in a job if, which is why an expression that works in one workflow fails when moved.

Where you wrote itContexts available there
run-namegithub, inputs, vars
concurrencygithub, inputs, vars
Top-level envgithub, secrets, inputs, vars
jobs.<id>.ifgithub, needs, vars, inputs
jobs.<id>.steps.ifgithub, needs, strategy, matrix, job, runner, env, vars, steps, inputs
jobs.<id>.outputsFull access, including secrets
Reusable workflow outputsgithub, jobs, vars, inputs

Common causes

Boolean passed as a quoted string

A with value like "true" (quoted) is a string, but the input is typed boolean, so validation rejects it.

Expression result type differs from declared type

An interpolated value resolves to a string while the input expects number or boolean.

How to fix it

Match the value type to the input type

  1. Pass booleans unquoted and numbers as numeric literals.
  2. When using an expression, ensure it yields the declared type (wrap with fromJSON or a comparison if needed).
  3. Re-run.
.github/workflows/ci.yml
jobs:
  call:
    uses: ./.github/workflows/deploy.yml
    with:
      deploy: true        # boolean, unquoted
      replicas: 3         # number

Catch it before it reaches CI

Every failure in this cluster is statically detectable. actionlint parses workflow expressions, checks context availability against the same rules above, and validates needs references, so these bugs never need to cost you a run.

Terminal
# one-off
docker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/repo" --workdir /repo rhysd/actionlint:latest -color

# as a job, before anything expensive runs
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- run: |
    bash <(curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rhysd/actionlint/main/scripts/download-actionlint.bash)
    ./actionlint -color

How to prevent it

  • Pass with values in the declared input type; do not quote booleans or numbers.
  • Declare explicit input types in workflow_call so mismatches fail early.

Frequently asked questions

What causes GitHub Actions reusable workflow "with:" input type mismatch?
There are 2 common causes: boolean passed as a quoted string and expression result type differs from declared type. A with value like "true" (quoted) is a string, but the input is typed boolean, so validation rejects it.
How do I fix GitHub Actions reusable workflow "with:" input type mismatch?
Match the value type to the input type. Pass booleans unquoted and numbers as numeric literals.
What does GitHub Actions reusable workflow "with:" input type mismatch actually mean?
The caller fails to start the reusable workflow, reporting that a with input does not match the declared type.
How do I stop GitHub Actions reusable workflow "with:" input type mismatch happening again?
Pass with values in the declared input type; do not quote booleans or numbers. The prevention section lists 2 changes that keep it from recurring.

Related guides

References

Not every red build is your code. Latchkey repairs the ones that are not, on the runner. Start free → 30-day trial · No credit card