Skip to content
Latchkey

GitHub Actions Reusable Workflow Input Type Mismatch

A reusable workflow declares an input as boolean or number, but the caller passes a quoted string (or a string expression), and the strict workflow_call typing rejects or mis-evaluates it.

What this error means

The caller fails validation with a type error, or the called workflow treats a boolean input as an always-truthy string, so an if: inputs.flag check behaves incorrectly.

.github/workflows/release.yml
# called workflow declares: enabled: { type: boolean }
# caller passes a string, which is not a boolean
with:
  enabled: 'true'   # rejected or treated as a string, not a real boolean

Diagnose it: print the context before you change anything

Most workflow-expression bugs are not syntax errors, they are an expression reading something that is empty. GitHub resolves a missing property to an empty string instead of failing the run, so a wrong reference looks like a logic bug rather than a mistake. Dump the contexts first and you will usually see the answer immediately.

.github/workflows/ci.yml
- name: Dump contexts
  run: |
    echo '--- github ---'   ; echo '${{ toJSON(github) }}'
    echo '--- needs ---'    ; echo '${{ toJSON(needs) }}'
    echo '--- steps ---'    ; echo '${{ toJSON(steps) }}'
    echo '--- matrix ---'   ; echo '${{ toJSON(matrix) }}'
    echo '--- inputs ---'   ; echo '${{ toJSON(inputs) }}'

Check the context is allowed where you used it

Contexts are not available everywhere. The same expression can be valid in a step if and invalid in a job if, which is why an expression that works in one workflow fails when moved.

Where you wrote itContexts available there
run-namegithub, inputs, vars
concurrencygithub, inputs, vars
Top-level envgithub, secrets, inputs, vars
jobs.<id>.ifgithub, needs, vars, inputs
jobs.<id>.steps.ifgithub, needs, strategy, matrix, job, runner, env, vars, steps, inputs
jobs.<id>.outputsFull access, including secrets
Reusable workflow outputsgithub, jobs, vars, inputs

Common causes

String passed to a typed input

workflow_call inputs are strictly typed as string, boolean, or number. Passing a quoted string to a boolean input does not coerce cleanly and an if check on it can be wrong.

Expression result is a string

Any ${{ }} expression yields a string. Feeding it to a boolean or number input requires the called workflow to interpret it, or a fromJSON to coerce.

How to fix it

Pass the correct literal type

.github/workflows/release.yml
# caller
with:
  enabled: true        # real boolean literal
  retries: 3           # real number literal

Coerce expression results explicitly

When a value comes from an expression, convert it to the declared type with fromJSON.

.github/workflows/release.yml
with:
  enabled: ${{ fromJSON(steps.flags.outputs.enabled) }}   # "true" -> boolean true

Catch it before it reaches CI

Every failure in this cluster is statically detectable. actionlint parses workflow expressions, checks context availability against the same rules above, and validates needs references, so these bugs never need to cost you a run.

Terminal
# one-off
docker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/repo" --workdir /repo rhysd/actionlint:latest -color

# as a job, before anything expensive runs
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- run: |
    bash <(curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rhysd/actionlint/main/scripts/download-actionlint.bash)
    ./actionlint -color

How to prevent it

  • Declare each workflow_call input with the type it truly is.
  • Pass boolean and number literals unquoted from the caller.
  • Use fromJSON to coerce expression results to boolean or number.

Frequently asked questions

What causes GitHub Actions reusable workflow input type mismatch?
There are 2 common causes: string passed to a typed input and expression result is a string. workflow_call inputs are strictly typed as string, boolean, or number.
How do I fix GitHub Actions reusable workflow input type mismatch?
There are 2 fixes depending on which cause you have: pass the correct literal type and coerce expression results explicitly. Work through them in order, since the first is the most common.
What does GitHub Actions reusable workflow input type mismatch actually mean?
The caller fails validation with a type error, or the called workflow treats a boolean input as an always-truthy string, so an if: inputs.flag check behaves incorrectly.
How do I stop GitHub Actions reusable workflow input type mismatch happening again?
Declare each workflow_call input with the type it truly is. The prevention section lists 3 changes that keep it from recurring.

Related guides

References

Not every red build is your code. Latchkey repairs the ones that are not, on the runner. Start free → 30-day trial · No credit card