Latchkey vs Buildkite

Updated August 2026·Figures are published list prices

Buildkite is a full CI platform with its own pipeline format and self-hosted agents. Latchkey replaces the machines your existing GitHub Actions jobs run on and leaves the workflows alone. The real decision is whether you want to migrate your pipelines at all.

The short answer

If your pipelines already live in GitHub Actions and you want them faster and cheaper, Buildkite asks you to migrate and to pay per seat. Latchkey asks you to change one line. Buildkite Pro bills $30 per active user per month plus $3.50 per agent per month, and its hosted Linux agents bill per vCPU-minute, so a 4 vCPU agent is $0.016 per minute against $0.0050 on a Latchkey medium.

Head to head

What you are comparingLatchkeyBuildkite
Pricing modelBuildkite Pro is $30 per active user per month and $3.50 per agent per month before any compute.Per runner-minute, flat by sizePer active user, plus per agent, plus per vCPU-minute
4 vCPU / 16 GB Linux, hosted computeBuildkite hosted Linux agents bill at $0.004 per vCPU-minute, so a 4 vCPU agent is four times that rate.$0.0050/min$0.016/min
Per-seat costNone. Latchkey does not charge per developer$30 per active user per month on Pro
Keeps your existing GitHub Actions workflowsYes, unchangedNo, pipelines are redefined in the Buildkite format
Runs agents on your own infrastructureNo, Latchkey runs the fleetYes, self-hosted agents are the core model
Free tier30 days free, 2,000 to 6,000 minutes per month by planUp to 5 users, 10 concurrent jobs, 2,000 Linux vCPU-minutes per month
Fixes failing builds on the runnerYes, on by defaultNo

Buildkite figures are list prices published at buildkite.com/pricing, read on August 2026. Latchkey figures are our own published list rates. Prices change: check both pages before you decide, and tell us if anything here has gone stale.

Which one you should pick

Choose Buildkite when
Buildkite is a full CI platform, not a runner. If you want to move your pipeline definitions off GitHub Actions entirely, run agents inside your own VPC on your own hardware, and orchestrate complex fan-out across many teams, that is what Buildkite is built for and Latchkey is not a replacement for it.
Choose Latchkey when
If your pipelines already live in GitHub Actions and you want them faster and cheaper, Buildkite asks you to migrate and to pay per seat. Latchkey asks you to change one line. Buildkite Pro bills $30 per active user per month plus $3.50 per agent per month, and its hosted Linux agents bill per vCPU-minute, so a 4 vCPU agent is $0.016 per minute against $0.0050 on a Latchkey medium.

Switching takes one line

Point runs-on at a Latchkey label. Your steps, actions, secrets, and matrix stay exactly as they are.

jobs:
  build:
-   runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+   runs-on: latchkey-medium
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

Questions about Latchkey and Buildkite

Is Latchkey a replacement for Buildkite?

Only if your pipelines are already in GitHub Actions. Buildkite is a full CI platform with its own pipeline format and its own orchestration. Latchkey replaces the machines your GitHub Actions jobs run on and leaves the workflows alone. Teams evaluating both are usually deciding whether to migrate their pipeline definitions at all.

How does Buildkite pricing compare to Latchkey?

The models differ. Buildkite Pro publishes $30 per active user per month plus $3.50 per agent per month, and its hosted Linux agents bill $0.004 per vCPU-minute, so a 4 vCPU agent costs $0.016 per minute. Latchkey has no per-seat and no per-agent charge, and bills a flat rate per runner-minute by size: $0.0050 per minute for a 4 vCPU / 16 GB runner.

Does Latchkey let me run jobs on my own hardware?

No. Latchkey runs a managed fleet, which is what removes the operational work of patching AMIs, sizing pools and paying for idle capacity. The Buildkite self-hosted agent model is the right answer if running the compute inside your own VPC is a hard requirement.

Do I have to rewrite my pipelines to use Latchkey?

No. Point runs-on at a Latchkey label and the workflow is unchanged: same steps, same actions, same secrets, same matrix. That is the main practical difference from adopting Buildkite, which involves redefining your pipelines in its own format.

Keep comparing

Latchkey

Stay in the loop

Product updates and CI/CD tips. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

We use cookies to improve your experience. Privacy Policy